4 minutes ago, TheBomber656 said:

95% of the Democratic party is anti-American. They don't even try to hide it anymore.

10 minutes ago, Analog1888 said:

That guy belongs in prison.

Lulz. You love persecution of free speech.

6 minutes ago, Analog1888 said:

95% of the Democratic party is anti-American. They don't even try to hide it anymore.

You are talking of course about the elected officials.

5 minutes ago, Snowlover76 said:

Lulz. You love persecution of free speech.

Yes if they are deliberately said to cause chaos and confusion from untruth propaganda. Next step would be anarchy.

Make sense?

3 minutes ago, Redo said:

Yes if they are deliberately said to cause chaos and confusion from untruth propaganda. Next step would be anarchy.

Make sense?

YAWN

8 minutes ago, Snowlover76 said:

Lulz. You love persecution of free speech.

Yeah I love persecution of damaging speech that causes people to act irrationally and forces people to spend millions of dollars they don't have, yes.

No freedoms are 100% free. You can't go outside and scream anything you want. You can't go publish slanderous material just because you feel like it.

Also, if you are on the air, we have a regulatory body, called the FCC. They prevent people from using offensive language and saying things that are potentially damaging.

You can express your opinions, but you cannot deliver information you know is false.

Suppose someone goes on the air and claims to be a doctor, but has no medical degree whatsoever.

And he offers advice to people that goes completely against modern medicine.

People follow his advice and get worse.

Should that guy be prosecuted? I say yes.

5 minutes ago, Redo said:

Yes if they are deliberately said to cause chaos and confusion from untruth propaganda. Next step would be anarchy.

Make sense?

He thinks you should be able to say whatever you want, print whatever you want, and do absolutely whatever you want.

It doesn't matter if it causes chaos, hurts other people, causes fights, etc.

If in his little fantasy world being against anarchy is "against free speech", then yes, I am proudly "against free speech".

Most of us learned why you can't have any freedom be absolutely 100% free when we were about eight years old.

But I digress.

So glad our founders thought differently. You guys are also likely gun grabbers too and woukd gladly like it if I wasn't allowed to own several semi automatic guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

4 minutes ago, Analog1888 said:

Yeah I love persecution of damaging speech that causes people to act irrationally and forces people to spend millions of dollars they don't have, yes.

No freedoms are 100% free. You can't go outside and scream anything you want. You can't go publish slanderous material just because you feel like it.

Also, if you are on the air, we have a regulatory body, called the FCC. They prevent people from using offensive language and saying things that are potentially damaging.

You can express your opinions, but you cannot deliver information you know is false.

Suppose someone goes on the air and claims to be a doctor, but has no medical degree whatsoever.

And he offers advice to people that goes completely against modern medicine.

People follow his advice and get worse.

Should that guy be prosecuted? I say yes.

Alex jones isn't really on the radio anymore. Hes almost exclusively streaming on the internet.

Go back to watching your Bill O'Reilly slop. That geriatric pervert is an irrelevant dweeb compared to the rest of the people who stream

And once Trump is gone the traditional cable TV news outlets will begin to rapidly die.

6 minutes ago, Snowlover76 said:

So glad our founders thought differently. You guys are also likely gun grabbers too and woukd gladly like it if I wasn't allowed to own several semi automatic guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

Our founders didn't think differently.

There have always been regulations on what you can say and publish.

The only difference is there wasn't radio and TV then, so there were no regulations for on the air.

WTF does this have to do with guns? I wouldn't trust you with guns because you would probably blow your own brains out accidentally.

6 minutes ago, Snowlover76 said:

Alex jones isn't really on the radio anymore. Hes almost exclusively streaming on the internet.

He should be streaming from jail.

5 minutes ago, Snowlover76 said:

Go back to watching your Bill O'Reilly slop. That geriatric pervert is an irrelevant dweeb compared to the rest of the people who stream

He is the most intelligent person on YouTube. Maybe if you watched him and more people like him you'd think like a normal person instead of someone who's a few words away from the nuthouse.

3 minutes ago, Snowlover76 said:

And once Trump is gone the traditional cable TV news outlets will begin to rapidly die.

Just like the Democrats said they would not have freedom to say what they want when Trump is president.

No TV outlets are going to die because of who the president is.

IF They do die, it's because the demographics are getting older and young people don't watch TV anymore.

And that doesn't matter who is in charge.

Just now, Analog1888 said:

Just like the Democrats said they would not have freedom to say what they want when Trump is president.

No TV outlets are going to die because of who the president is.

IF They do die, it's because the demographics are getting older and young people don't watch TV anymore.

And that doesn't matter who is in charge.

That's what I was saying. People pretty much only tune into cable news because they either worship trump or hate trump and most of them are old ***** boomers. The 50ish and under crowd doesn't watch cable news slop like the olds do.

4 minutes ago, Analog1888 said:

I wouldn't trust you with guns because you would probably blow your own brains out accidentally.

Ive owned amd shot guns since I was like 10 bro.

3 minutes ago, Analog1888 said:

He is the most intelligent person on YouTube. Maybe if you watched him and more people like him you'd think like a normal person instead of someone who's a few words away from the nuthouse.

Wasn't intelligent enough not to get in trouble for being a sleazy pervert?

Anybody want to guess who created the first "anti free speech" law?

John Adams. Go look up the Alien and Sedition Acts.