June 27Jun 27 June 2025 I recorded 105 by me, which is the hottest temperature I’ve experienced in my life and it was a 105 and 104 for two days. Looks like we may be getting a repeat unfortunately.
June 27Jun 27 30 minutes ago, Andrew said:Let’s hope theI stopped following Central Parks temps during the summer of 2006. Where I used to live in Queens, I set up my own thermometer, and I did pretty good with it and even where I live now I do the same thing and there was a guy who lives a couple of blocks from me. he has a official underground station at my temp correlates with his very well.But people tend to forget to is that there is a general climate, and there are micro climates. Even where I go to in the park when I walk the dogs, the eastern side of it is warmer than the western side especially in an early morning. Many times I’ve walked to the western side of the park with is more thicker vegetation along the trail and it’s several degrees cooler and you can feel the difference.Nobody said the thermometer is bad. The location is bad.
June 27Jun 27 37 minutes ago, FrankPizz said:Sucks everyone knows it's wrong and nothing is done, no matter who is in charge.Ever since Jeff Tongue retired, nobody at the NWS seems to care if Newark is too warm or Central Park is too cool.
June 27Jun 27 2 hours ago, FrankPizz said:They put a solar shield over it dont they? Its like they want it in a shadow or something. Temps derived from tree rings should be discounted then since you know, they were shielded by their leavesOk then let's rip off the solar shield from the sensor and we'll call it even.
June 27Jun 27 1 hour ago, Analog1888 said:Nobody said the thermometer is bad. The location is bad.Correct.
June 27Jun 27 I think the tree canopy prevents Central Park from radiational cooling on windless nights...it is what it is and with that said it still could hit 100 in the park...
June 27Jun 27 2 hours ago, FrankPizz said:I was joking. Not 1 person cares enough about central parks temps over the past 15+ years to do anything, so their temps mean absolutely nothing to me. If they dont care, I dont either. Its one location. There are tons more to use plus 1000s of personal stations to look at.Problem is they use that as the official record. If JFK is equal to or hotter than you when you're in the city (I'm not even talking about buildings, just the fact that they are further north and west away from the ocean) then you're thermometer readings are crap.
June 27Jun 27 20 minutes ago, Sundog said:Euro has 111 degrees for Colt's Neck July 3rd.IF this NINO is going to turn out to be a Super one, we are already have more 90° days for May and June than we ever had for the Strong/Super Ninos. If we get over 100 that is going to be the first time that happens if this NINO is indeed super.
June 27Jun 27 1 minute ago, Andrew said:IF this NINO is going to turn out to be a Super one, we are already have more 90° days for May and June than we ever had for the Strong/Super Ninos. If we get over 100 that is going to be the first time that happens if this NINO is indeed super.This is what i have been saying. I don't deny there's a massive nino in the pacific. But it is not acting like a nino in the conus.
June 27Jun 27 1 hour ago, Sundog said:Euro has 111 degrees for Colt's Neck July 3rd.Euro also less rainy on the 4th compared to gfs
June 27Jun 27 1 hour ago, Analog1888 said:This is what i have been saying. I don't deny there's a massive nino in the pacific. But it is not acting like a nino in the conus.I'd rather see a hot summer like 1977 or 2002...hot el nino summers...1957...hot June and July...great winter...1963...three major heat waves but overall a below average summer...great winter...1968...hot July...good winter...1977...hot summer...great winter...1991...hot summer...lousy winter...1994...hot June and July...lousy winter...2002...hot summer...great winter...2015...hot summer...one great storm...1991 was the only year that didn't get a big snowstorm over 10" the next winter...1969, 1994 and 2015 had one good to great storm...
June 27Jun 27 12 minutes ago, uncle w said:I'd rather see a hot summer like 1977 or 2002...hot el nino summers...1957...hot June and July...great winter...1963...three major heat waves but overall a below average summer...great winter...1968...hot July...good winter...1977...hot summer...great winter...1991...hot summer...lousy winter...1994...hot June and July...lousy winter...2002...hot summer...great winter...2015...hot summer...one great storm...1991 was the only year that didn't get a big snowstorm over 10" the next winter...1969, 1994 and 2015 had one good to great storm...1991-92 was like a drier and colder version of 1997-98. Snowstorms on March 19 and 22 1992 prevented us from having a truly horrific winter because we could have beaten in 1972-73. The snowstorm on the 22nd caused the plane to skid off the runway at LaGuardia Airport.
June 27Jun 27 some plane crashes in the snow ...25 minutes ago, Andrew said:1991-92 was like a drier and colder version of 1997-98. Snowstorms on March 19 and 22 1992 prevented us from having a truly horrific winter because we could have beaten in 1972-73. The snowstorm on the 22nd caused the plane to skid off the runway at LaGuardia Airport.1957...1961...101 of 106 on Mexican Jet Escape in Idlewild Wreck; Southeastern Queens Is Scene of Airliner's Crash AIRLINER BURNS ON TAKE-OFF HERE - The New York Times
June 28Jun 28 Author 4 hours ago, Sundog said:Problem is they use that as the official record.If JFK is equal to or hotter than you when you're in the city (I'm not even talking about buildings, just the fact that they are further north and west away from the ocean) then you're thermometer readings are crap.The problem is nothing is done and everyone knows it. It just needs to be ignored. They cant measure either. The whole station is trash
June 28Jun 28 7 hours ago, FrankPizz said:The problem is nothing is done and everyone knows it. It just needs to be ignored. They cant measure either. The whole station is trashYeah you really need to use KLGA and KEWR snow totals for Central Park. And the tree canopy effects wind, too. It's always "variable" and lighter than it should be.
Create an account or sign in to comment